Liquidation Preference Waterfall Calculator
Model the full LP waterfall — 1x / 2x multiples, non-participating / participating / capped, stacked vs pari passu seniority, accrued dividends, and the preferred-to-common conversion flip. See exactly what founders take home at every exit price.
| Stakeholder | Type | Payout | % of Exit | Per Share | MOIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Founders | founder | $52.17M | 52.2% | $8.70 | — |
| Employees | employee | $13.04M | 13.0% | $8.70 | — |
| Option Pool | pool | $13.04M | 13.0% | $8.70 | — |
| Series A | preferred | $21.74M | 21.7% | — | 4.35x |
What is a liquidation preference waterfall?
A liquidation preference waterfall determines who gets paid — and in what order — when a venture-backed company is acquired, IPOs, or otherwise liquidates. Preferred stockholders with the highest seniority are paid first, up to a defined multiple of their original investment plus any accrued dividends. Remaining proceeds cascade down through junior preferred tiers and, finally, to common stockholders. The waterfall is the core mechanic that separates an investor-friendly term sheet from a founder-friendly one.
1x vs 2x vs 3x multiples: when each appears in term sheets
Most healthy modern term sheets specify a 1x liquidation preference multiple. 2x appears in down rounds, bridge financings, and investor-heavy markets. 3x is now rare and usually signals distress — it was common in bubble-era late-stage deals and sometimes in specialized bridge loans. Every additional multiple pushes the break-even exit higher before common stock sees a dollar, so founders should negotiate hard to keep LP multiples at 1x.
Non-participating vs participating vs capped participating preferred
Non-participating: the investor chooses the higher of LP or pro-rata conversion. Clean, founder-friendly, standard. Participating: the investor takes LP and shares pro-rata in the remaining proceeds. Double-dip. Very investor-friendly. Capped participating: participation is allowed but the total payout is limited to a multiple of the investment (e.g., 3x cap). At exits above the cap, the investor renounces participation in favor of as-converted common — putting a ceiling on the drag.
Seniority: stacked tiers vs pari passu
Stacked seniority means later rounds are paid before earlier rounds. Pari passu means rounds at the same tier share the exit pot pro-rata by LP claim. Pari passu is common at the seed/Series A layer; stacked seniority is the norm at growth stages where each round negotiates senior treatment. A 4-tier stack can create heavy LP overhang that buries common stock until an outlier exit.
The preferred conversion decision (when preferred becomes common)
Each preferred holder has a conversion election at closing: take the LP payout, or convert to common and take a pro-rata share of the entire exit. Rational holders pick the higher of the two. Converting changes the pool denominator, which changes everyone else's pro-rata, so the solver iterates until every round has chosen its higher payout. The calculator above runs up to 20 passes — healthy stacks usually converge in 2–5.
Accrued dividends and compounding in the waterfall
A cumulative dividend quietly inflates the LP claim over time. An 8% annual cumulative dividend on a $10M round, held for 4 years, adds roughly $3.6M to the claim — before the waterfall even runs. Most early-stage rounds have 0% dividends; corporate VC and late-stage credit-style rounds are where the dividend drag becomes meaningful. Check the report card's Dividend Drag dimension for your exposure.
Common stock payout at acquisition: the zero zone
The “zero zone” is every exit price where common stock receives $0 after LP claims are satisfied. For a clean 1x non-participating stack, the zero-zone ends at total invested capital. For a 2x participating stack, the zero-zone can extend to 2–3× invested capital. Every founder should know their zero-zone exit threshold before signing the next term sheet — it is the floor below which no one on the common side walks away with anything.
How to read a Series A liquidation preference example
Worked example: a $5M Series A at $20M pre-money (20% of a $25M post-money) with 1x non-participating preferred. At any exit below $5M, the Series A takes everything. At $10M exit, the Series A takes its $5M LP and $5M flows to common. At $25M exit, the investor is indifferent — LP ($5M) equals pro-rata (20% of $25M = $5M). Above $25M, the investor converts to common and takes 20% of the exit. The calculator does this for every round and tier automatically, including under participation and seniority stacks.
M&A waterfall calculator: what founders check before signing
Before signing an M&A LOI or a new term sheet, founders should model: the zero-zone exit threshold, each round's conversion decision, any participation cap that binds, total founder take-home at the expected exit, and the sensitivity to exit price. The What-If Simulator and Reverse Calculator above exist for exactly this pre-signing sanity check.
Frequently asked questions
How do you calculate a liquidation preference waterfall?
Pay seniority tiers top-down: investment × LP multiple + accrued dividends. Within a tier, rounds pro-rata split. Remaining proceeds participate with common. Each round picks the higher of LP vs converted payout, iterated until stable.
What is 1x non-participating liquidation preference?
Investor takes the higher of 1× investment back (LP) or pro-rata share of exit as-converted — never both. Founder-friendly, clean, standard.
How does 2x participating preferred work in an acquisition?
2× investment paid first, then the investor also participates pro-rata in the remaining proceeds. Double-dip. Very investor-heavy, especially uncapped.
At what exit price does common stock start earning money?
Above the total LP stack (sum of investment × LP multiple across non-converted rounds + accrued dividends). Below that, common is in the zero zone.
What is a participation cap and when does it trigger?
A total-payout ceiling on participating preferred (e.g., 3× invested). Above the cap-binding exit, the investor converts to common and gives up participation.
How do pari passu and stacked seniority differ at acquisition?
Pari passu splits a tier pro-rata by LP claim. Stacked pays later rounds before earlier rounds, creating progressively deeper LP overhang.
When should preferred stock convert to common?
Whenever pro-rata as-converted payout exceeds LP + participation. The solver iterates until every round has chosen its higher payout.
What is a Series A liquidation preference example?
$5M at $20M pre-money, 1x non-participating. Below $5M exit, investor takes all. $10M exit: $5M LP + $5M to common. $25M: indifferent. Above $25M: converts.
How do accrued dividends affect the waterfall?
Cumulative dividends compound annually and are added to the LP claim. 8% for 4 years on $10M ≈ $3.6M uplift to the LP claim before the waterfall runs.
What's the difference between 1x and 2x liquidation preference?
The multiple sets the minimum guaranteed return on LP. 2x doubles the break-even exit before common earns anything. 1x is standard; 2x signals down rounds or investor-heavy markets.